Resources

Here are some useful resources that my lab has used in recent years. These mainly focus on ways that we can try to improve the quality and transparency of scientific workflows.

This selection of journal papers and books provides a brief overview to Open Science and meta-science in general. Together, they motivate why the resources below have become an essential component to my lab’s research.

  • Journal articles
    • False positive psychology: 2011
    • Scientific Utopia: 2012
    • Estimating reproducibility in psychology: 2015
    • A manifesto for reproducible science: 2017
    • Psychology’s Renaissance: 2018
    • Implications for scientific practice: 2018
    • Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science: 2022
  • Books
    • The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology: 2017
    • Science Fictions: 2021

My lab has been inspired to adopt a Bayesian estimation approach to statistical analysis. The general workflow follows Richard McElreath’s outstanding textbook and the translation into brms and Tidyverse by Solomon Kurz:

Here are a bunch of other links to stats stuff that I’ve found really valuable to read:

  • Kruschke’s Doing Bayesian Data Analysis

  • Kruschke & Liddell. A good primer on the differences between frequentist and Bayesian analyses, as well as hypothesis testing and estimation approaches.

  • Bodo Winter’s book is a great introduction to estimation approaches. It provides great R code for beginners and uses frequentist language, which should be more familiar to most. It is a great place to start and provides a natural platform to thinking about the same estimation approaches in a Bayesian context.

  • brms is a fabulous tool in R for running Bayesian analyses in STAN

  • Gigerenzer’s statistical rituals paper

  • On statistical thinking more generally

  • And why we need to do much more work before we think about running “tests” of hypotheses - Scheel and co.

  • A platform to support open science - OSF and intro video
  • A nice overview on four types of validity by Simine Vazire and co.

  • Why validity matters in experimental work in psychology and the importance of manipulation checks. One and Two

  • A fabulous empirical demonstration on the lack of relevant validity in a very well-cited social perception task - by Wendy Higgins and co. here and here